Maisie Williams (Game of Thrones)

Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PharoahEgypt

Guest
I heard that those Columbians are very fond of marching, particularly while snorting a white powdery substance? :rolleyes:
 
C

chrisdef

Guest
I don’t understand all the hate. You do realise photographers use just as much fakery to hide things as others do to uncover them. I find it weird the video clearly shows nipples yet the pictures (which no doubt have high powered flash) show nothing.
I’m not saying the pictures are real I’m certainly no computer or photography expert. But can anyone refute that photographers regularly airbrush to hide things and that the video clearly shows the shirts are see through (from further away) how does a high powered camera (and flash) not pick that same (or better) image up from standing directly above them?
Thought I should add this. I’ll admit I haven’t seen that pic anywhere else. Celeb jihad fakes always have a watermark. At least that I ever have seen. This one doesn’t. It’s weird it’s no where else but also strange it was basically so tame and without a watermark.
Can you picture experts explain 100% this wasn’t edited the opposite way. Ie airbrushed over the nipples to hide them (which isn’t uncommon) instead of the other way around.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
J

Jobe1

Guest
I don’t understand all the hate. You do realise photographers use just as much fakery to hide things as others do to uncover them. I find it weird the video clearly shows nipples yet the pictures (which no doubt have high powered flash) show nothing.
I’m not saying the pictures are real I’m certainly no computer or photography expert. But can anyone refute that photographers regularly airbrush to hide things and that the video clearly shows the shirts are see through (from further away) how does a high powered camera (and flash) not pick that same (or better) image up from standing directly above them?
Thought I should add this. I’ll admit I haven’t seen that pic anywhere else. Celeb jihad fakes always have a watermark. At least that I ever have seen. This one doesn’t. It’s weird it’s no where else but also strange it was basically so tame and without a watermark.
Can you picture experts explain 100% this wasn’t edited the opposite way. Ie airbrushed over the nipples to hide them (which isn’t uncommon) instead of the other way around.
Airbrushing can't just be undone, airbrushing the nipples out would likely involve cloning the clothing around the area and painting over the nipples, once that's been done the nipple data is no longer in the picture, so no one can just come along and undo what the editor did
 
C

chrisdef

Guest
Airbrushing can't just be undone, airbrushing the nipples out would likely involve cloning the clothing around the area and painting over the nipples, once that's been done the nipple data is no longer in the picture, so no one can just come along and undo what the editor did

I know, I’m not that stupid. I ment is it possible this was the original photo that was then airbrushed over for the picture that was then made public?
 
J

Jobe1

Guest
I know, I’m not that stupid. I ment is it possible this was the original photo that was then airbrushed over for the picture that was then made public?
Well no because it's so clearly fake, look at Sophie's tit, you can still see the body from the original picture they shopped in above and below it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top