J
JustAmazing82
Guest
Give me 5mins to finish my wank and I’ll delete it.
Give me 5mins to finish my wank and I’ll delete it.
Yeah I’m on my 6th.You still jerking off?![]()
Colombian shemales, he can't get enough of themYou still jerking off?![]()
They don’t have to be ColumbianColombian shemales, he can't get enough of them
It’s all about the Albino’s nowadaysI heard that those Columbians are very fond of marching, particularly while snorting a white powdery substance?![]()
These nipples weren’t airbrushed over they had a fucking shield a dragon couldn’t penetrate placed across them to protect her modesty
I hear Doofy once found a packet of white stuff in the cupboard titled self raising, he tried a line thinking it would cure his erectile dysfunctionIt’s all about the Albino’s nowadays
Two muffins grew out of his noseI hear Doofy once found a packet of white stuff in the cupboard titled self raising, he tried a line thinking it would cure his erectile dysfunction![]()
Airbrushing can't just be undone, airbrushing the nipples out would likely involve cloning the clothing around the area and painting over the nipples, once that's been done the nipple data is no longer in the picture, so no one can just come along and undo what the editor didI don’t understand all the hate. You do realise photographers use just as much fakery to hide things as others do to uncover them. I find it weird the video clearly shows nipples yet the pictures (which no doubt have high powered flash) show nothing.
I’m not saying the pictures are real I’m certainly no computer or photography expert. But can anyone refute that photographers regularly airbrush to hide things and that the video clearly shows the shirts are see through (from further away) how does a high powered camera (and flash) not pick that same (or better) image up from standing directly above them?
Thought I should add this. I’ll admit I haven’t seen that pic anywhere else. Celeb jihad fakes always have a watermark. At least that I ever have seen. This one doesn’t. It’s weird it’s no where else but also strange it was basically so tame and without a watermark.
Can you picture experts explain 100% this wasn’t edited the opposite way. Ie airbrushed over the nipples to hide them (which isn’t uncommon) instead of the other way around.
Airbrushing can't just be undone, airbrushing the nipples out would likely involve cloning the clothing around the area and painting over the nipples, once that's been done the nipple data is no longer in the picture, so no one can just come along and undo what the editor did
Well no because it's so clearly fake, look at Sophie's tit, you can still see the body from the original picture they shopped in above and below itI know, I’m not that stupid. I ment is it possible this was the original photo that was then airbrushed over for the picture that was then made public?
That's a fake dipshitFrom a camera man on set
Sigh.From a camera man on set